|
all rights reserved 2002
|
Lorentz
Transformations
and the |
X
|
= |
|
(1) |
T
|
= |
|
(2) |
where
you will recall that
is
the time dilation factor. These remarkably simple formulas are called the Lorentz
transformation laws.
They contain virtually everything you need to know about special relativity. It
is not necessary to study them in detail in order to understand the implications
of Special Relativity. We write them down for two reasons. First, a cursory
inspection will show that for low velocities, they are nearly identical to the
Galilean transformation laws. Remember that if v is much less than c,
is
close to one. If you ignore
,
Eq.8 is
identical to the Galilean equivalent 11.1.
Moreover, the last term in 11.9
will be negligibly small when v is small, so that in this limit the
Lorentz transformation equation gives t = t'. This correspondence
with the Galilean transformation at low velocities had to be true for Special
Relativity to be consistent with our everyday experience.
The
second reason for writing down 11.8
and 11.9
is that they will allow us to deduce the expression for the addition of
velocities in special relativity. We will do this in the same way that we
derived the simple addition of velocities in the case of Galilean
transformations. Let us return to Figs. 11.2
and 11.3
and consider a ball that is thrown in O' at a speed of u'. If the
ball is thrown at t = t' = 0 and x = x' = 0 then in
the O' frame the coordinate of the ball as a function of time is just x'
= u't' where u' is the velocity relative to O'. The Lorentz
transformation laws 11.8
and 11.9
tell us what the corresponding coordinates are in the unprimed frame. This
immediately gives us the relationship between the velocities u'and u:
u |
= |
|
|
|
= |
|
(11.10) |
Notice
that the time dilation factor completely cancels out of the right hand side of
the above equation. If we now divide the top and bottom by t', replace x'/t'
by u' everywhere it occurs, we get the velocity transformation law:
u
=
|
(11.11) |
Eq.11.11
is an amazing formula. It differs from the common sense Galilean transformation
law only by the second term in the denominator, but this extra term makes a
world of difference for high relative velocities. However, if both u and v
are small compared to c this term is negligibly small, and the formula
reduces precisely to the Galilean transformation law 11.3
for the addition of velocities. However, for speeds that are significant
compared to that of light, some very remarkable things happen.
For
example, if instead of a ball, a beam of light is emitted by O', at a
speed u' = c. What is the speed as measured in the frame O?
In this case 11.11
gives
u
=
|
(11.12) |
As
required by Special Relativity, the speed of light as measured in O is c,
irrespective of the speed with which O' is moving.
We
can also ask what happens if the frame O' is moving at three quarters the
speed of light, and the ball is thrown at three quarters the speed of light in
the same direction. What is the net velocity of the ball relative to O?
Putting u = 3c/4 and v = 3c/4 into 11.11
we find
u'
=
|
(11.13) |
The
net speed is still less than c! In fact it is easy to verify that no
matter how fast O' is going (as long as it is less than c) and no
matter how fast the ball is thrown (as long as it is less than c), the
net velocity as measured relative to O will always be less than cas
well.
There
is yet another important implication of all this. In order to increase the
velocity of an object you must exert a force over some finite distance. Thus,
the agent exerting the force must to some extent be moving with the object that
is being accelerated. We can approximate this process by a series of steps in
which you accelerate the object instantaneously, then catch up to it and repeat
the process. In particular, suppose you throw a ball at a speed of 3c/4,
and then fire rockets so that you are moving along side. You then throw the ball
again at 3c/4 relative to your new frame. The Galilean transformation law
would imply that the ball is now moving relative to the initial frame at the 3c/2.
However the relativistic law says that the ball is only moving at 24c/25
with respect to the initial frame. Since we are trying to approximate a process
whereby you continuously accelerate the ball over a finite distance, you now
fire your rockets again to catch up with the ball and then throw the ball one
more time at 3c/4 relative to your new frame. In this case (v = 24c/25,
3c/4) the transformation law gives a velocity of relative to the initial
frame of u = 171c/172. This is close, but still less than c.
It should be clear at this stage, that no matter how often you repeat this
process you will never get the ball to exceed the speed of light, although by
repeating this process enough times you can get arbitrarily close. The
implication is it is impossible to accelerate an object to speeds greater than
that of light by exerting a finite force is over finite distance (i.e. by doing
a finite amount of work). Thus, c is the ultimate speed limit in the
Universe.